- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:32:32 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
ejw@cs.ucsc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
------- Additional Comments From ejw@cs.ucsc.edu 2004-12-03 10:32 -------
I agree with Lisa that the access control implications of REBIND should be made
explicit.
My suggestion is to add the following language to Section 6.
Change:
"It is effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request."
To:
"It is effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request, and MUST be treated as a
MOVE for the purpose of determining access permissions (see RFC 3744, Appendix B)."
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 18:32:34 UTC