- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 05:06:09 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 Summary: 3xx in multistatus Product: WebDAV-RFC 2518-bis Version: -06 Platform: Other URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist- auth/2004JulSep/0154.html OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: 12. Multi-Status Response AssignedTo: joe-bugzilla@cursive.net ReportedBy: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org The 300-303, 305 and 307 responses defined in HTTP 1.1 normally take a Location header to indicate where the client should make the request. The Multi-Status response syntax as defined in RFC2518 did not allow for the Location header information to be included in an unambiguous way, so servers MAY choose not to use these status codes in Multi-Status responses. If a clients receives this status code in Multi-Status, the client MAY reissue the request to the individual resource, so that the server can issue a response with a Location header for each resource. Additionally, this specification defines a new element that servers MAY use in the response element to provide a location value in Multi-Status (see section 13.29). I think we can improve that: - "not to use" -- be clear what this means -- is it using a "200" status element instead? - when the server chooses not to return the 3xx code, should it include the location element nevertheless (I think it should) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Saturday, 27 November 2004 13:06:10 UTC