- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 05:06:09 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47
Summary: 3xx in multistatus
Product: WebDAV-RFC 2518-bis
Version: -06
Platform: Other
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-
auth/2004JulSep/0154.html
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: 12. Multi-Status Response
AssignedTo: joe-bugzilla@cursive.net
ReportedBy: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
The 300-303, 305 and 307 responses defined in HTTP 1.1 normally take
a Location header to indicate where the client should make the
request. The Multi-Status response syntax as defined in RFC2518 did
not allow for the Location header information to be included in an
unambiguous way, so servers MAY choose not to use these status codes
in Multi-Status responses. If a clients receives this status code in
Multi-Status, the client MAY reissue the request to the individual
resource, so that the server can issue a response with a Location
header for each resource.
Additionally, this specification defines a new element that servers
MAY use in the response element to provide a location value in
Multi-Status (see section 13.29).
I think we can improve that:
- "not to use" -- be clear what this means -- is it using a "200" status
element instead?
- when the server chooses not to return the 3xx code, should it include
the location element nevertheless (I think it should)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Saturday, 27 November 2004 13:06:10 UTC