- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:30:00 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: ejw@cs.ucsc.edu, "'WebDAV (WebDAV WG)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> Jim Whitehead wrote:
>
>>
>>> So, could you please specify exactly which situation you'd like the
>>> example to be for? My understanding was:
>>>
>>> - Method: REBIND
>>> - Locks on: source and target collection
>>>
>>> Correct?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like the example to be the following.
>>
>> Given the following collection hierarchy, the example should cover a
>> REBIND
>> of C3:(CollZ->C1) to C3:(CollZ->C2).
>>
>> +------------------+
>> | Root Collection |
>> | bindings: |
>> | CollW |
>> +------------------+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> +-------------------------------+
>> | Collection C1 |<--------+
>> | bindings: | |
>> | CollX CollY | |
>> +-------------------------------+ |
>> | | |
>> | | (creates loop) |
>> | | |
>> +-----------------+ +------------------+ |
>> | Collection C2 | | Collection C3 | |
>> | LOCKED infinity | | LOCKED infinity | |
>> | bindings: | | bindings: | |
>> | {none} | | y.gif CollZ | |
>> +-----------------+ +------------------+ |
>> | | |
>> | +------+
>> |
>> +---------------------------+
>> | Resource R2 |
>> | (lock inhereited from C3) |
>> +---------------------------+
>>
>> Note that it's fine with me if we don't discuss exactly how the lock
>> state
>> in the example came to be -- just take it as a given, and go from there.
>
>
> Wow.
>
> Just to make sure, we're talking about
>
> MOVE /CollW/CollY/CollZ HTTP/1.1
> Destination: /CollW/CollX
> Overwrite: T
>
> ?
>
> Best regards, Julian
OK,
given the lock tokens L2 for C2 and L3 for C3, I'd say the REBIND
request would be:
REBIND /CollW HTTP/1.1
If: <http://example.com/CollW/CollY/CollZ> (<L3>)
<http://example.com/CollW/CollX> (<L2>)
Overwrite: T
<rebind xmlns="DAV:">
<segment>CollX</segment>
<href>/CollW/CollY/CollZ</href>
</rebind>
Reason: we need to supply both lock tokens as we're removing a binding
to C3 that is protected by the lock L3, and we're removing the target
binding /CollW/CollY which is protected by the lock L2.
Best regards, Julian
--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 21:30:36 UTC