RE: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08

• From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
• Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:43:25 -0800
• To: "'WebDAV \(WebDAV WG\)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <200412011943.iB1JhW2B016123@cats-mx4.ucsc.edu>

Julian writes:

> 3.2.1  Example for DAV:parent-set property

*snip*

>       <parent-set xmlns="DAV:">
>         <parent>
>           <href>/CollX</href>
>           <segment>x.gif</segment>
>         </parent>
>         <parent>
>           <href>/CollX</href>
>           <segment>y.gif</segment>
>         </parent>
>       </parent-set>

Seems to me the href should hold a fully qualified URL, since other hrefs in
the specification do this as well.

- Jim

PS -- While we're on the subject, I'll hold this up as an example of the
kind of interpretation difference reasonable implementers can make of
language that seems perfectly clear (and this is *much* more simple than the
syntax for If headers).

Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004 19:45:08 UTC