RE: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification from Jim Whitehead on 2004-11-12 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2004)

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:19:19 -0800
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200411121819.iACIJQP13963@cats-mx1.ucsc.edu>

Julian,

> I expanded the replacement further to:
> 
>     The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from the collection
>     identified by the Request-URI, and adds a binding to that resource
>     into another collection.  The request body specifies the segment to
>     be removed and the new binding to be created (href element).  It is
>     effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request.

I like this language, though I suggest the following tweak for the second
sentence to fix the fact that we're not removing a segment, we're removing a
binding:

The request body specifies the binding to be removed (segment) and the new
binding to be created (href).

- Jim

Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 18:20:06 UTC