Re: Comments on bind-08

OK, since I don't feel strongly about this, I'm happy to defer to
Julian's preference.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 11/30/2004 11:47:46 AM:

> 
> Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> > I wasn't suggesting that we change the semantics for MOVE (and I agree 
that
> > we cannot do so).  What we can do is define the semantics for 
> > DAV:resource-id,
> > since that is a new property that is being introduced by this spec. So
> > what I was suggesting was that we state that a server cannot implement
> > DAV:resource-id in a way that it is modified during a MOVE operation. 
This
> > just means that a server cannot use some existing custom property to 
> > implement
> > DAV:resource-id if that custom property is not preserved during a 
MOVE.
> 
> Understood. However, that makes it impossible to implement a server that 

> indeed does support DAV:resource-id and REBIND while keeping MOVE's old 
> semantics (and, as a matter of fact, this is what we want to do).
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>