Julian Reschke wrote: > > OK, > > this new draft contains the changes made in the two previous weeks: > > 'A.5 Since draft-ietf-webdav-bind-06 > > Rewrite Editorial Note. Open and resolve issues "2.6_identical", > "specify_safeness_and_idempotence" and "ED_rfc2026_ref".' > > > As far as I am concerned (I know I'm speaking for the currently active > authors), this spec can be considered finished. There won't be any > progress anymore unless more people actually sit down and read it; and > the best way to achieve this is to actually issue the working group > last-call (as planned in the working group's charter for May). > > Lisa, Joe? > > Best regards, Julian Lisa, Joe, could you please be so kind to state why -- from the working groups chair's point of view -- the BIND spec hasn't been last-called yet. Whatever is blocking progress here, please state it so that the authors and the other members of the working group can help resolving it. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 07:25:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:32 UTC