RE: [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be defined for BIND and UNBIND

I think the fact that there are explicit bind and unbind privileges in the
ACL protocol means that this doesn't need to be addressed in the bind
specification.

- Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:38 PM
> To: Webdav WG
> Subject: Re: [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be 
> defined for BIND and UNBIND
> 
> 
> Great; what about BIND and UNBIND?
> 
> lisa
> 
> On Dec 3, 2004, at 12:58 PM, bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
> 
> > http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
> >
> > julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:
> >
> >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > -----
> >              Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
> >          Resolution|                            |FIXED
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de   
> > 2004-12-03 12:58 -------
> > Intro to REBIND changed to:
> >
> >    The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from a 
> collection,
> >    and adds a binding to that resource into the collection 
> identified 
> > by
> >    the Request-URI.  The request body specifies the binding 
> to be added
> >    (segment) and the old binding to be removed (href).  It is
> >    effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request, and MUST be treated
> >    the same way as MOVE for the purpose of determining access
> >    permissions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You 
> reported the 
> > bug, or are watching the reporter.
>

Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 21:49:04 UTC