Re: Comments on bind-08

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

> I wasn't suggesting that we change the semantics for MOVE (and I agree that
> we cannot do so).  What we can do is define the semantics for 
> DAV:resource-id,
> since that is a new property that is being introduced by this spec.  So
> what I was suggesting was that we state that a server cannot implement
> DAV:resource-id in a way that it is modified during a MOVE operation.  This
> just means that a server cannot use some existing custom property to 
> implement
> DAV:resource-id if that custom property is not preserved during a MOVE.

Understood. However, that makes it impossible to implement a server that 
indeed does support DAV:resource-id and REBIND while keeping MOVE's old 
semantics (and, as a matter of fact, this is what we want to do).

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:48:20 UTC