- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:03:02 -0800
- To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Geoff Clemm writes:
> The REBIND method was intended to have syntax that paralleled
> BIND. This means that the request-URL is the collection into
> which the binding is being created, the segment in the body
> is the new binding name in the request-URL collection, and
> the href in the body is the "source", i.e. the resource that
> is being rebound.
>
> The recent edits in this section (intended to address Jim's
> observation that the meaning of arguments of the method were
> not underspecified) were incorrect and broke this. In
> particular, the introductory sentences of REBIND should be
> modeled after BIND, and the precondition names (which were
> originally correct) should be restored.
Do we care that the parameters are now switched as compared to those of
MOVE?
Source Destination
MOVE Request-URI Destination header
REBIND href XML elem Request-URI plus segment
XML elem
I think it doesn't matter, but thought I should raise it.
- Jim
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 00:03:58 UTC