- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:15:41 -0800
- To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
This bug/issue has been repeatedly closed "worksforme". I do not agree that the issue is closed. What is our model for whether a bug can be closed or not? Lisa On Dec 5, 2004, at 6:39 PM, bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote: > http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com 2004-12-05 > 18:39 ------- > Since RFC 2518 allows two URIs to map to the same resource, it is the > responsibility of RFC-2518 to define the semantics of properties when > accessed > from different URIs that map to the same resource. The bindings draft > will > inherit whatever semantics is defined for this by 2518. > > If there is ambiguity in semantics introduced by 2518, it should be > fixed in > 2518bis, not in the bindings draft. Having one spec define the > functionality > of a feature defined by another spec is always a bad idea, since > unless the > two specs are evolved in lock step (which never happens), there will be > periods of times when the two specs say conflicting things about that > feature. > > > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 18:15:59 UTC