- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:00:19 +0100
- To: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- CC: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Brian Korver wrote: >>>> 02-C01 Condition Name >>>> >>>> Use name of precondition, not failure description: >>>> <quota-not-exceeded/> instead of <storage-quota-reached/>. >>> >>> There was no clear consensus when I asked for a show of hands on >>> the list >>> on whether this change was desired/required. >> >> >> I can't recall you asking; but I'm sure you can point to a message in >> the mailing list archive? >> >> Anyway, *I* recall that you agreed to change it >> (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JulSep/ >> 0107.html>) and the only disagreement came from Lisa (in >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JulSep/ >> 0109.html>, but she said she didn't want to delay the draft because >> of that). > > > Right, those are the emails. > > I agree with Lisa that I don't feel it's worth delaying the draft > over either. Are you saying that you would object to the draft > moving forward if your suggested change isn't made? > ... I'm convinced that re-using RFC3253 terminology in an inconsistent way is a Very Bad Idea, in particular if there doesn't seem to be any rationale for it except "personal preference". Thus, I'll continue to object, and, as far as I can tell from the previous mails, I seem to be part of the WG majority here. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 24 December 2004 12:00:57 UTC