- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 05:03:04 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45
Summary: DAV request header
Product: WebDAV-RFC 2518-bis
Version: -06
Platform: Other
URL: http://http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-
auth/2004JulSep/0154.html
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: 09. HTTP Headers for Distributed Authoring
AssignedTo: joe-bugzilla@cursive.net
ReportedBy: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
9.1
Thanks for adding it, however I think we need to do some more work:
As an optional request header, this header allows the client to
advertise compliance with named features. Clients need not
advertise 1, 2 or bis because a WebDAV server currently doesn't need
that information to decide how to respond to requests defined in
this specification or in HTTP/1.1. However, future extensions may
define client compliance codes. When used as a request header, the
DAV header MAY affect caching so this header SHOULD NOT be used on
all GET requests.
1) Just say generally that only those feature names are allowed where
the spec explicitly defines what it means (in a request!). For
RFC2518bis this means that none of the feature names defined here may be
used.
2) "When used as a request header, the DAV header MAY affect caching so
this header SHOULD NOT be used on all GET requests." - this is
misleading. Either it is allowed on GET, or it isn't. If the request
header affects a cacheable GET result, the origin server MUST specify
that in the "Vary" header.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Saturday, 27 November 2004 13:03:04 UTC