- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 05:03:04 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45 Summary: DAV request header Product: WebDAV-RFC 2518-bis Version: -06 Platform: Other URL: http://http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist- auth/2004JulSep/0154.html OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: 09. HTTP Headers for Distributed Authoring AssignedTo: joe-bugzilla@cursive.net ReportedBy: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org 9.1 Thanks for adding it, however I think we need to do some more work: As an optional request header, this header allows the client to advertise compliance with named features. Clients need not advertise 1, 2 or bis because a WebDAV server currently doesn't need that information to decide how to respond to requests defined in this specification or in HTTP/1.1. However, future extensions may define client compliance codes. When used as a request header, the DAV header MAY affect caching so this header SHOULD NOT be used on all GET requests. 1) Just say generally that only those feature names are allowed where the spec explicitly defines what it means (in a request!). For RFC2518bis this means that none of the feature names defined here may be used. 2) "When used as a request header, the DAV header MAY affect caching so this header SHOULD NOT be used on all GET requests." - this is misleading. Either it is allowed on GET, or it isn't. If the request header affects a cacheable GET result, the origin server MUST specify that in the "Vary" header. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Saturday, 27 November 2004 13:03:04 UTC