- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:57:13 +0100
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > > Jim Whitehead wrote: > >> Julian, >> >> >>> I expanded the replacement further to: >>> >>> The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from the collection >>> identified by the Request-URI, and adds a binding to that resource >>> into another collection. The request body specifies the segment to >>> be removed and the new binding to be created (href element). It is >>> effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request. >> >> >> >> I like this language, though I suggest the following tweak for the second >> sentence to fix the fact that we're not removing a segment, we're >> removing a >> binding: >> >> The request body specifies the binding to be removed (segment) and the >> new >> binding to be created (href). > > > Good catch. I'll make that change. > > Best regards, Julian OK, the current edits are at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html> (issues list: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-issues.html>) -- www.webdav.org seems to be down right now, so I can't update it. Again, as far as I can tell, there are no issues left that haven't been discussed here on the mailing list before. Note that I assume that if an issue is raised and discussed here without any feedback from the original poster, I can assume it's resolved. I therefore plan to submit this version as draft 08 which then should get it's working group last call. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 16:57:50 UTC