- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:56:48 -0800
- To: <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
- Cc: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
I would prefer it to be explicit (my vote does not change) but I'll agree this issue can be closed with consensus against making it explicit. Lisa On Dec 3, 2004, at 1:48 PM, Jim Whitehead wrote: > > I think the fact that there are explicit bind and unbind privileges in > the > ACL protocol means that this doesn't need to be addressed in the bind > specification. > > - Jim > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org >> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault >> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:38 PM >> To: Webdav WG >> Subject: Re: [Bug 4] Privilege interactions need to be >> defined for BIND and UNBIND >> >> >> Great; what about BIND and UNBIND? >> >> lisa >> >> On Dec 3, 2004, at 12:58 PM, bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote: >> >>> http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 >>> >>> julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed: >>> >>> What |Removed |Added >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> ----- >>> Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED >>> Resolution| |FIXED >>> >>> >>> >>> ------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de >>> 2004-12-03 12:58 ------- >>> Intro to REBIND changed to: >>> >>> The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from a >> collection, >>> and adds a binding to that resource into the collection >> identified >>> by >>> the Request-URI. The request body specifies the binding >> to be added >>> (segment) and the old binding to be removed (href). It is >>> effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request, and MUST be treated >>> the same way as MOVE for the purpose of determining access >>> permissions. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You >> reported the >>> bug, or are watching the reporter. >> > >
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 22:57:04 UTC