- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:53:39 -0500
- To: <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
- Cc: "'WebDAV \(WebDAV WG\)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004 20:54:08 UTC
Jim wrote on 12/01/2004 03:16:02 PM: > Geoff writes: > I'm OK with adding this as the form of an example, i.e., in section 2.6, > after the sentence stating that new resources get new resource-id's, we > could say that "for example, when a new version resource is created, it > receives a new resource-id". > > That's fine with me, and let's mention VCRs while we're at it. Now that's a more interesting topic (:-). When you use the VERSION-CONTROL method with a specified Version, one could interpret that as just restoring that resource, as opposed to creating a new resource. I can imagine repository vendors having strong (contradictory :-) opinions on that topic, so I'd suggest maintaining a discrete silence on that topic for now (and if it needs to be resolved, do so in the RFC-3253bis, and not in the binding specification). Cheers, Geoff
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004 20:54:08 UTC