- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:53:34 -0500
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8758588F.4D6867A1-ON85256F34.0040ECC9-86256F34.00415490@us.ibm.com>
Unfortunately, I also will not be able to attend that meeting physically (I'm traveling that day, so will not be able to attend remotely either). So I would also prefer that we have the final discussion on BIND in the mailing list, but completely agree with the second half of the bullet (i.e., "Let's push this out."). Cheers, Geoff Julian wrote on 10/21/2004 03:25:15 AM: > > Joe Hildebrand wrote: > > I've just asked for a slot for us in DC. > > I will not be able to attend that meeting physically, but I'll try the > text conferencing. Generally, for those who need to do travel planning > and booking, it would be extremely helpful to know about an upcoming > meeting longer in advance. > > > Does anyone want to propose agenda items? Here are a couple that I'd like > > to propose: > > > > - Final discussion on BIND. Let's push this out. > > I'd prefer to do it on the mailing list. Looking back at the previous > meetings, none of the active draft contributors attended the meeting > physically (except the WG chairs), so no actual progress was made that way. > > > - Redirect: any discussion needed > > - 2518bis: status report > > - Status of drafts of note for the working group: > > + PATCH > > + Quota > > + Property datatyping > > + SEARCH > > + CalDAV > > + WebDAV-events > > > > If possible, I'd like for authors of the outstanding documents to attend, so > > that anything that is discussed can be incorporated into his/her thought > > process. > > As far as the drafts that I author are concerned, I'll post a summary in > time before the meeting. I'd also like to ask the authors of other > drafts to actually follow-up to the feedback that was sent to the > mailing list in response to their drafts being published.
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:54:10 UTC