Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday March 08 2013 15:00UTC
- Formal WebID Teleconf Friday March 08 2013 15:00UTC
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
- Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the social spam
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 22 2013 15:00UTC
Friday, 22 February 2013
- Linked Data based Issues Tracker Zeitgeist for WebID Community Group
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 22 2013 15:00UTC
- Re: 303 and HTTPbis
- Re: 303 and HTTPbis
- Re: 303 and HTTPbis
- Re: 303 and HTTPbis
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
- Re: Turtle is a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Turtle is a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Blues Brothers - Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
Monday, 18 February 2013
- Re: Blues Brothers - Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Linked Data nuances, exemplified
- Re: Blues Brothers - Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Blues Brothers - Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Point of Order! - Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Point of Order! - Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Point of Order! - Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: Point of Order! - Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Point of Order! - Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Point of Order! - Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 18 2013 15:00UTC
- Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 22 2013 15:00UTC
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 18 2013 15:00UTC
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 18 2013 15:00UTC
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 18 2013 15:00UTC
- Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 18 2013 15:00UTC
- WebID-ISSUE-75 (dereferencing): dereferencing process must be well defined [WebID-conceptual-spec]
- Meeting minutes for Friday 08 2012 WebID Teleconf
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
Sunday, 17 February 2013
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
Saturday, 16 February 2013
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
- Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs
Friday, 15 February 2013
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes? - conclusion
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Xturtle 1.0 is Turtle editing the Eclipse-way
- Re: WebID authentication and subsequent visualization of the dereferenced WebID profile in 3D
- Re: WebID authentication and subsequent visualization of the dereferenced WebID profile in 3D
- Re: WebID authentication and subsequent visualization of the dereferenced WebID profile in 3D
- Re: WebID authentication and subsequent visualization of the dereferenced WebID profile in 3D
- WebID authentication and subsequent visualization of the dereferenced WebID profile in 3D
Monday, 11 February 2013
- The PKCS#11 URI Scheme
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: Refers Or Denotes?
- Refers Or Denotes?
- Re: WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
- Re: WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
- Re: WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
- Re: WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
- Re: WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
- Re: WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
- WebID definition -- proposal: drop the word 'uniquely'
Friday, 8 February 2013
- Re: RELATIONSHIP: A vocabulary for describing relationships between people
- Re: RELATIONSHIP: A vocabulary for describing relationships between people
- Re: RELATIONSHIP: A vocabulary for describing relationships between people
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: RELATIONSHIP: A vocabulary for describing relationships between people
- RELATIONSHIP: A vocabulary for describing relationships between people
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: WebID Community Group Issues Tracking Linked Data
- WebID Community Group Issues Tracking Linked Data
- Re: Action-61 -- suggested revision of product list
- Re: Normative references
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- WebID-ISSUE-74 (flow new def through spec): revised WebID definition must be flowed through conceptual spec, removing hashURI specificity [WebID definition]
- Action-61 -- suggested revision of product list
- Re: Normative references
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: Normative references
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: Normative references
- Re: WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: Normative references
- Normative references
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- WebID implementation for Drupal
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
Thursday, 7 February 2013
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Contd: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 8 2013 15:00UTC
- Issue-18: Transfer protocol independence
- Action-17: User Stories and use cases
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
- Fwd: CfP for METHOD 2013
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- TimBLs foaf profile
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
- Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
Monday, 4 February 2013
Friday, 1 February 2013
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 1 2013 15:00UTC
- Re: Should we employ WebID authentication only with Self-signed certificates?
- WebID-ISSUE-73 (security-definition): Security section in the Definition Spec [WebID definition]
- Authentication Security spec issue opened
- WebID-ISSUE-72 (privacy-def): privacy consideration section [WebID definition]
- Re: Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 1 2013 15:00UTC