- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:19:22 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79ejB1_D_6VXKSy428B1cOoPMMeJ_bu-Q2VoVxabk9mP4bA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote: > On 2/18/13 1:34 PM, Andrei Sambra wrote: > >> >> The notice was never "inserted", especially not by "exploiting the editor >> privilege" as you have stated earlier. I find that accusation very >> offensive and I would like to ask you to refrain from doing it again. The >> note was there from the beginning, when we split the spec last year. >> > Andrei, > > And guess what, I hereby apologize for making that accusation. > > > Please look at the mercurial history if you want to confirm it. >> > > Yes, I had a conversation with Melvin (offline) and his unveil this most > vital piece of information. Now, bearing in mind my apology, could at least > acknowledge the fact that you could have simply provided this reply to my > earlier mails [1]. > At that point I was simply defending the reason why I wrote the note in the first place. The spec had the note ever since November 18th, 2012 [1]. I have also publicly announced [2] that I was finishing the spec draft on Nov. 19th, 2012, so being unaware of it was not my fault. I simply assumed that you had read the spec before starting accusing me. Andrei [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/427afd1d488b#l1.34 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Nov/0111.html
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 19:20:18 UTC