W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: opening issue-74 - Re: (Dis)Proving that 303s have a performance impact.

From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:19:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFG79ejB1_D_6VXKSy428B1cOoPMMeJ_bu-Q2VoVxabk9mP4bA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:

> On 2/18/13 1:34 PM, Andrei Sambra wrote:
>> The notice was never "inserted", especially not by "exploiting the editor
>> privilege" as you have stated earlier. I find that accusation very
>> offensive and I would like to ask you to refrain from doing it again. The
>> note was there from the beginning, when we split the spec last year.
> Andrei,
> And guess what, I hereby apologize for making that accusation.
>  Please look at the mercurial history if you want to confirm it.
> Yes, I had a conversation with Melvin (offline) and his unveil this most
> vital piece of information. Now, bearing in mind my apology, could at least
> acknowledge the fact that you could have simply provided this reply to my
> earlier mails [1].

At that point I was simply defending the reason why I wrote the note in the
first place. The spec had the note ever since November 18th, 2012 [1]. I
have also publicly announced [2] that I was finishing the spec draft on
Nov. 19th, 2012, so being unaware of it was not my fault. I simply assumed
that you had read the spec before starting accusing me.


[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/427afd1d488b#l1.34
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Nov/0111.html
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 19:20:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC