- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:56:37 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 14:57:07 UTC
On 11 February 2013 15:25, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2013, at 12:06, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > > "A WebID is an HTTP URI which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person, > Organization, Group, Device, etc.)." > > I propose we drop 'uniquely'. Unclear it adds anything here and may be > confusing (at least it was to me). > > If the implication is that the webid contains 1 or more IFP that are > unique, it's not even clear to me how we would test that. > > > Not sure which spec you are reading. It's not in here: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.htm > I was looking at: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html > > [[ > A WebID is a URI with an HTTP or HTTPS scheme which denotes an Agent > (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). For WebIDs with fragment > identifiers (e.g. #me), the URI without the fragment denotes the Profile > Document. For WebIDs without fragment identifiers an HTTP request on the > WebID *must* return a 303 with a Location header URI referring to the > Profile Document. > ]] > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 14:57:07 UTC