Re: Action-61 -- suggested revision of product list

On 8 Feb 2013, at 17:57, Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> All --
> 
> This suggestion may be imperfect, but I think it will be 
> a lot more useful than what we now have.
> 
> current product list
> ====================
> implementations
> Interoperability
> liaison with other groups
> ontologies
> research
> use cases
> User Interface/Browsers
> WebID definition
> WebID-TLS
> wiki
> 
> 
> suggested new product list
> ==========================
> WebID User Stories
> WebID Use Cases & Requirements
> WebID Conceptual Spec                 == identity-respec
> WebID-over-TLS Protocol Spec          == auth-respec
> WebID-over-TLS test suite 
> WebID-over-TLS implementation report
 Ontology                               == We have a published auth ontology
> WebID Protocols Interop               (to be spec? note? other?)

Thanks, that looks good.

The WebID Protocols Interop is more something like:
 
   Web Identity Interoperability. 

This goes a bit beyond WebID as we have it now. I see 
that as someting we want to if we have time and energy 
put together in a note to explain how we think we can 
get all the different protocols to iteroperate by the use
of reasoning/logic. Clearly in depth this is way beyond what 
we have the  capacity to do here. But it is something 
the W3C can get logicians to develop and work on. And also 
it is something we are gaining some implementation knowledge of.
But it is soemthing everyone will bump up against, so it's worth
documenting. So a note is worth it.

In many ways we have already gone way beyond what our XG
Deliverables were meant to be.

But in any case the products listed make sense, and those
categories are ones a WG could take over easily.  

 Henry

> 
> 
> I think every action and issue will need to be reviewed and 
> assigned to the appropriate new product.  
> 
> I do not think simply renaming existing products will achieve 
> the necessary and desired result, because some current products
> aren't really products (e.g., liaison, wiki), and even those
> that are don't *quite* correspond to the new divisions.
> 
> Thoughts appreciated!
> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> 
> --
> A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
> | Q: Are you sure?
> | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> 
> Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
> Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
>                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>         10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
>     Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>     LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>     Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>     Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>     Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/