- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:00:11 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <512144DB.3060507@openlinksw.com>
On 2/17/13 2:52 PM, Henry Story wrote: > On 17 Feb 2013, at 19:56, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > >>> From my perspective telling a reader of a spec that using 303 redirect will require an extra HTTP requests sounds a bit like stating the obvious... > Thanks Elf. The argument that it is obvious that 303s are less efficient for requiring an extra redirect, is the best argument I have read here against having this section up to now. It is nice to see commonsense sprouting from the darkness of the winter night. Spring must be on its way. > > I would have embraced your argument fully had the length of this thread not show how non-evident this actually seems to be to many. Elf: you've just received a typical response from Henry who (unfortunately) doesn't understand the role of a community group chair person or the editor of a spec. Thus, even though he agrees with your point, nothing will change. Henry: This isn't a dictatorship in disguise. Do check up the essence of parliamentary process. Don't try to use a W3C community group (or related) to push your personal agenda. It will never succeed. Thus, stop wasting the limited time of folks that are trying to make something of WebID and its application re. the WebID+TLS protocol. Your choices are as follows (once again): 1. Call a vote . 2. Perform a proper Linked Data experiment -- you'll have a hypothesis, observations (in the form of empirical data), and conclusion at your disposal. 3. Remove the unnecessary notice. Why are you averse to what's outlined above? > > Henry > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2013 21:00:34 UTC