- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:43:02 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKzN7LPm5zb0Zx9PUeKq6adM-w9xCEYDy1Z2euUPF8X8A@mail.gmail.com>
On 11 February 2013 21:37, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > Henry / Andrei, > > I current see: > "A WebID is an HTTP URI which *refers* to an Agent (Person, Organization, > Group, Device, etc.)." > > But in the context of RDF based Linked Data, the RDF workgroup (after > serious thought on this matter) [1] has opted to use what would equate to: > > A WebID is an HTTP URI which *denotes* an Agent (Person, Organization, > Group, Device, etc.). > > The more we stick to definitions and terminology being used across other > W3C groups the easier things will be (on the appreciation and adoption > front) for WebID, over the long haul. > Wasnt this settled in the vote as 'denotes'. I dont mind either, so long as we can move forward. FWIW, Would lean towards 'denotes'. > > > Links: > > 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-**rdf11-concepts-20130115/#** > resources-and-statements<http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130115/#resources-and-statements>. > 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-**rdf11-concepts-20130115/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130115/>-- latest RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax edition . > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehen<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen> > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/about<https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about> > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehen<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen> > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 20:43:30 UTC