- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:55:56 +0000
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Excerpts from ☮ elf Pavlik ☮'s message of 2013-02-17 18:54:17 +0000: ** somehow first line got folded into a quite :( ** >From my perspective telling a reader of a spec that using 303 redirect will require an extra HTTP requests sounds a bit like stating the obvious... > > Section 2 looks to me clear enough about having two options of connecting WebID and WebID Profile > > Personally seeing such a strong opposition to this NOTE I don't see strong enough reasons for keeping it in this spec... even more that this opposition comes also from one of a people mentioned in Acknowledgments :) > > And most of all, *questionable* usefulness of this NOTE, in my eyes really doesn't justify all this negative energy it causes between participants of this group :( > > ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2013 18:56:22 UTC