W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:05:16 +0100
Cc: public-webid@w3.org
Message-Id: <4204E92D-35A6-42EB-986F-59513081CA89@bblfish.net>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>

On 6 Feb 2013, at 19:00, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> In the end it's just a note, with no impact on the definition itself, since I've removed the part about verifiers.
> 
> That's an inaccurate assumption. If that were true, I wouldn't be writing this mail :-)

The text currently is this:

[[
Hash URIs are encouraged when choosing a WebID since 303 redirects impact performance for clients. All examples in the spec will use such hash URIs.
]]

What is wrong with it? 

Henry
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:05:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC