On 6 Feb 2013, at 19:00, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > >> In the end it's just a note, with no impact on the definition itself, since I've removed the part about verifiers. > > That's an inaccurate assumption. If that were true, I wouldn't be writing this mail :-) The text currently is this: [[ Hash URIs are encouraged when choosing a WebID since 303 redirects impact performance for clients. All examples in the spec will use such hash URIs. ]] What is wrong with it? Henry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC