W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:52:54 +0100
Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EFEB7531-94AB-434A-8484-E5C2EB5C5FF9@bblfish.net>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>

On 17 Feb 2013, at 19:56, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

>> From my perspective telling a reader of a spec that using 303 redirect will require an extra HTTP requests sounds a bit like stating the obvious...

Thanks Elf. The argument that it is obvious that 303s are less efficient for requiring an extra redirect, is the best argument I have read  here against having this section up to now. It is nice to see commonsense sprouting from the darkness of the winter night. Spring must be on its way.

I would have embraced your argument fully had the length of this thread not show how non-evident this actually seems to be to many. 


Social Web Architect

Received on Sunday, 17 February 2013 19:53:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC