On 17 Feb 2013, at 19:56, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >> From my perspective telling a reader of a spec that using 303 redirect will require an extra HTTP requests sounds a bit like stating the obvious... Thanks Elf. The argument that it is obvious that 303s are less efficient for requiring an extra redirect, is the best argument I have read here against having this section up to now. It is nice to see commonsense sprouting from the darkness of the winter night. Spring must be on its way. I would have embraced your argument fully had the length of this thread not show how non-evident this actually seems to be to many. Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC