Re: WebID 1.0 -- Section 3 -- Removal of Note

On 17 Feb 2013, at 19:56, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

>> From my perspective telling a reader of a spec that using 303 redirect will require an extra HTTP requests sounds a bit like stating the obvious...

Thanks Elf. The argument that it is obvious that 303s are less efficient for requiring an extra redirect, is the best argument I have read  here against having this section up to now. It is nice to see commonsense sprouting from the darkness of the winter night. Spring must be on its way.

I would have embraced your argument fully had the length of this thread not show how non-evident this actually seems to be to many. 

Henry


Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/