Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On 6 February 2013 12:39, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As promised, I have updated the spec according to the latest poll
>> results. I've also cleaned it up a little, mainly fixing inconsistencies
>> with some terms.
>>
>> I would like to ask everyone to take a look and see if everything is ok
>> before we move to WebID-TLS.
>>
>> Here is the link to the latest version:
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html
>>
>
> Minor thing:
> foaf:nameThe name of the individual or agent.foaf:knowsThe WebID URI of a
> known person.foaf:weblogThe person or agent's blog URI
>
> I would keep name and knows in the example but rather have depiction,
> rather than, weblog, as this is a common identifier in modern social
> networks.  Additionally mbox is often a good thing to have, tho there may
> be some privacy issues on that one.
>
You're right. It's much more useful to have an example with foaf:img
(updated the spec). If only people would use it instead of displaying the
WebID URI after login. ;)


>
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Andrei
>>
>
>