W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:58:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLR-w=OtaFA1Km-xHjwY-2RjDk5wntX4qi6VJCO6P+nFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
On 6 February 2013 12:50, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6 February 2013 12:39, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As promised, I have updated the spec according to the latest poll
>>> results. I've also cleaned it up a little, mainly fixing inconsistencies
>>> with some terms.
>>>
>>> I would like to ask everyone to take a look and see if everything is ok
>>> before we move to WebID-TLS.
>>>
>>> Here is the link to the latest version:
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html
>>>
>>
>> "A WebID is an HTTP URI which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person,
>> Organization, Group, Device, etc.)."
>>
>> Do we need the work 'uniquely' in there?  I'm slightly unclear on what it
>> means.
>>
>
> It means that the WebID URI is a unique identifier. Maybe I should replace
> "denotes" with "identifies", though there is no official definition for
> what "identification" is (hence it's much easier to say denotes, but maybe
> not as strong).
>

Still not sure I have understood what 'unique' means in this context?


>
> Andrei
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:59:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC