W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Refers Or Denotes? - conclusion

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:41:26 +0100
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-webid@w3.org
Message-Id: <BB38D605-1771-4B5C-B3B1-2A0D70B82E1C@bblfish.net>
To: nathan@webr3.org

On 13 Feb 2013, at 22:35, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

>> On 13 Feb 2013, at 22:23, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>>> On 13 Feb 2013, at 22:17, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> 
> completely lost with this conversation - what's the point here?

I think we settled that denotes and refers are synonymous, at least
that is what Pat Hayes told us. 

As a result I updated the picture in the spec
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/file/e29e9282b565/spec/img/WebID-overview.graffle

and also improved the sense/meaning relation, since in philosophy of logic
reference/dentotion is determined by sense/meaning.

Henry

PS. nathan I sent you a mail regarding 
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/58


Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/



Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 21:42:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:41 UTC