W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Formal WebID Teleconf Friday February 22 2013 15:00UTC

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:14:03 +0100
Message-Id: <15060A1C-3B65-4A5D-A02E-D75848155E5E@bblfish.net>
To: "public-webid@w3.org Group" <public-webid@w3.org>
( Sorry for earlier mistake with date - there is of course no meeting on 18th but on Friday 22 )

Meeting Time:
Friday 22 February, 15:00 UTC, 16:00 Paris, 10:00 New York
full time zone information:  http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130222T15
tel: +1-617-761-6200
sip: zakim@voip.w3.org
irc: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid

Agenda:

Meeting Minutes from last time
------------------------------

Vote of meeting minutes for last time
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-minutes.html

Actions
-------

ACTION-47: Put forward 1 of the raised issued every 3 days approximately for discussion in view of closure
 Proposal: close - that was dated Oct 24, 2011 . We are making progress now, but in a different way

ACTION-42: Write sparql query for ping back form http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/05/09/
 Proposal: close - That seems to be more of a ReadWriteWeb spec issue.

ACTION-43 Send mail and add entry to wiki page for the state of Drupal WebID component, so that others can join and help out
 Proposal: close, there seems to be progress there http://drupal.org/project/webid
         ( perhaps if Stephane can add the information to the right wiki page where we keep
           info about implementations )

ACTION-58: Contact Nathan and see whether action-57 satisfies issue-18
  Proposal: Close, I contacted Nathan a couple of times with no response. We will need to decide this for ourselves.


ISSUES 
------

- ISSUE-6: using ASN.1 formats for WebID description
  Proposal: close or postpone. Currently we have enough with Turtle as the default representation. We don't exclude this as a representation that could be used, but it is not within our scope to define this.

- ISSUE-23: Authorized Representations and Dereferencing a WebID URI
  Proposal: this seems to contain a number of issues. The part that says
    "the dereferencing process be well defined" seems relevant to current debates.
     See next ISSUE.

- ISSUE-75: dereferencing process must be well defined
  Proposal: Open

- ISSUE-55: explore WebID URI-schema openness
 Proposal: close
          This was solved in the previous vote on HTTP URIs.

- ISSUE-74: revised WebID definition must be flowed through conceptual spec, removing hashURI specificity



Next Meeting 
------------

Agree to next meeting 


Henry

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/



Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 11:14:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:42 UTC