W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:52 -0500
Message-ID: <511397B0.9010007@openlinksw.com>
To: public-webid@w3.org
On 2/7/13 3:24 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>> >3. can someone point me to an application architecture in connection
>> >with webID besides robots that would make such a lack performance really
>> >feelable for the enduser.
> Tim Berners lee pointed out to issues he had with Tabulator in terms of
> speed and other issues.

Can we take this to a straw poll. Let's save everyone's time on this 
matter. I don't agree with this position for a plethora of reasons. As 
you will find out (I am sure) via a poll that includes those who have 
actually built and deployed Linked Data solutions, this paragraph is an 
undue distraction and detraction re., the definition of a WebID (an HTTP 

Yourself and Andrei shouldn't use editorial position to ignore the 
fundamental findings from an important vote. That simply isn't right 
when dealing with a community such as this i.e., once comprised of 
people how have developed and deployed Linked Data applications for many 



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 12:02:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC