W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Web Identity and Discovery - WebID 1.0

From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:58:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFG79eigmOFJTyM_sW5CyTrj9CoOE7GhV_VXHSkyVcnH-0aE_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote:

>
> On 6 Feb 2013, at 12:47, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6 February 2013 12:39, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As promised, I have updated the spec according to the latest poll
>> results. I've also cleaned it up a little, mainly fixing inconsistencies
>> with some terms.
>>
>> I would like to ask everyone to take a look and see if everything is ok
>> before we move to WebID-TLS.
>>
>> Here is the link to the latest version:
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html
>>
>
> "A WebID is an HTTP URI which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person,
> Organization, Group, Device, etc.)."
>
> Do we need the work 'uniquely' in there?  I'm slightly unclear on what it
> means.
>
>
> Agree. It may get people to think that only one uri can denote them.
> Also I would remove Device. Some devices such as hammers, are not agents.
>

A hammer is a tool, not a device. Instead, I can imaging an "intelligent"
power hammer taking advantage of WebID for software updates.

Andrei


>
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Andrei
>>
>
>
>     Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:59:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:49 UTC