- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:58:47 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:59:33 UTC
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote: > > On 6 Feb 2013, at 12:47, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 6 February 2013 12:39, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As promised, I have updated the spec according to the latest poll >> results. I've also cleaned it up a little, mainly fixing inconsistencies >> with some terms. >> >> I would like to ask everyone to take a look and see if everything is ok >> before we move to WebID-TLS. >> >> Here is the link to the latest version: >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html >> > > "A WebID is an HTTP URI which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person, > Organization, Group, Device, etc.)." > > Do we need the work 'uniquely' in there? I'm slightly unclear on what it > means. > > > Agree. It may get people to think that only one uri can denote them. > Also I would remove Device. Some devices such as hammers, are not agents. > A hammer is a tool, not a device. Instead, I can imaging an "intelligent" power hammer taking advantage of WebID for software updates. Andrei > > >> >> Best, >> Andrei >> > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 11:59:33 UTC