- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:15:36 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79eh0hf+-OS5L4Z1_6ifWehXyOwkfcDKM_jHe8u-O1mS1Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, I got confused. For some reason I thought the teleconf was today. (sleep depraved) On Feb 18, 2013 11:53 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 18 Feb 2013, at 11:51, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regrets, I am travelling today > > You are travelling today, so you can't come on Friday? > > Henry > > Andrei > On Feb 18, 2013 11:45 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > >> >> Meeting Time: >> Friday 18 February, 15:00 UTC, 16:00 Paris, 10:00 New York >> full time zone information: >> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130208T15 >> tel: +1-617-761-6200 >> sip: zakim@voip.w3.org >> irc: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid >> >> Agenda: >> >> Meeting Minutes from last time >> ------------------------------ >> >> Vote of meeting minutes for last time >> http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-minutes.html >> >> Actions >> ------- >> >> ACTION-47: Put forward 1 of the raised issued every 3 days approximately >> for discussion in view of closure >> Proposal: close - that was dated Oct 24, 2011 . We are making progress >> now, but in a different way >> >> ACTION-42: Write sparql query for ping back form >> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/05/09/ >> Proposal: close - That seems to be more of a ReadWriteWeb spec issue. >> >> ACTION-43 Send mail and add entry to wiki page for the state of Drupal >> WebID component, so that others can join and help out >> Proposal: close, there seems to be progress there >> http://drupal.org/project/webid >> ( perhaps if Stephane can add the information to the right wiki >> page where we keep >> info about implementations ) >> >> ACTION-58: Contact Nathan and see whether action-57 satisfies issue-18 >> Proposal: Close, I contacted Nathan a couple of times with no >> response. We will need to decide this for ourselves. >> >> >> ISSUES >> ------ >> >> - ISSUE-6: using ASN.1 formats for WebID description >> Proposal: close or postpone. Currently we have enough with Turtle as >> the default representation. We don't exclude this as a representation that >> could be used, but it is not within our scope to define this. >> >> - ISSUE-23: Authorized Representations and Dereferencing a WebID URI >> Proposal: this seems to contain a number of issues. The part that says >> "the dereferencing process be well defined" seems relevant to >> current debates. >> See next ISSUE. >> >> - ISSUE-75: dereferencing process must be well defined >> Proposal: Open >> >> - ISSUE-55: explore WebID URI-schema openness >> Proposal: close >> This was solved in the previous vote on HTTP URIs. >> >> - ISSUE-74: revised WebID definition must be flowed through conceptual >> spec, removing hashURI specificity >> >> >> >> Next Meeting >> ------------ >> >> Agree to next meeting >> >> >> Henry >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 11:16:08 UTC