- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:51:22 +0100
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79ej4C7sncepuYL_yLkSDUieBaHJuhcfpU4jcVJgENX1ERw@mail.gmail.com>
Regrets, I am travelling today. Andrei On Feb 18, 2013 11:45 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > Meeting Time: > Friday 18 February, 15:00 UTC, 16:00 Paris, 10:00 New York > full time zone information: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130208T15 > tel: +1-617-761-6200 > sip: zakim@voip.w3.org > irc: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid > > Agenda: > > Meeting Minutes from last time > ------------------------------ > > Vote of meeting minutes for last time > http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-minutes.html > > Actions > ------- > > ACTION-47: Put forward 1 of the raised issued every 3 days approximately > for discussion in view of closure > Proposal: close - that was dated Oct 24, 2011 . We are making progress > now, but in a different way > > ACTION-42: Write sparql query for ping back form > http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/05/09/ > Proposal: close - That seems to be more of a ReadWriteWeb spec issue. > > ACTION-43 Send mail and add entry to wiki page for the state of Drupal > WebID component, so that others can join and help out > Proposal: close, there seems to be progress there > http://drupal.org/project/webid > ( perhaps if Stephane can add the information to the right wiki > page where we keep > info about implementations ) > > ACTION-58: Contact Nathan and see whether action-57 satisfies issue-18 > Proposal: Close, I contacted Nathan a couple of times with no response. > We will need to decide this for ourselves. > > > ISSUES > ------ > > - ISSUE-6: using ASN.1 formats for WebID description > Proposal: close or postpone. Currently we have enough with Turtle as > the default representation. We don't exclude this as a representation that > could be used, but it is not within our scope to define this. > > - ISSUE-23: Authorized Representations and Dereferencing a WebID URI > Proposal: this seems to contain a number of issues. The part that says > "the dereferencing process be well defined" seems relevant to current > debates. > See next ISSUE. > > - ISSUE-75: dereferencing process must be well defined > Proposal: Open > > - ISSUE-55: explore WebID URI-schema openness > Proposal: close > This was solved in the previous vote on HTTP URIs. > > - ISSUE-74: revised WebID definition must be flowed through conceptual > spec, removing hashURI specificity > > > > Next Meeting > ------------ > > Agree to next meeting > > > Henry > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 10:51:52 UTC