Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs

On 17 Feb 2013, at 12:24, Adrian Gschwend <ktk@netlabs.org> wrote:

> On 16.02.13 18:19, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> 
>> Go make a Linked Data application. Until you've done that, don't lecture
>> those that have built, shipped, and received payments for Linked Data
>> useful products.
> 
> I agree with Kingsley, it's one thing to think about it and another
> thing to do it. I didn't see any problems with hash URIs until I started
> work on a more generic Linked Data platform and ran into all the issues.

It is fine to run into issues. But this here is a standards forum, where 
we move ahead by making these issues explicit so that others ( including
ourselves) can learn from them. Just saying "I have more experience than
thou therefore do what I say" is important argument in many aspects of life
such as in a company or military setting when things need to be done at a
certain speed but it can't work in this forum. This forum of course does
not try to resolve all issues. We base ourselves on previous standards,
and real deployment experience especially where it can be explained clearly
and the experience duplicated.


As such your previous response with regards to 303s is the type
of arguments I am looking for.

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2013Feb/0180.html

I will leave time for others to answer that, so that this forum
can be more participative.

 
	Henry

> 
> cu
> 
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> Adrian Gschwend
> @ netlabs.org
> 
> ktk [a t] netlabs.org
> -------
> Open Source Project
> http://www.netlabs.org
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/