Friday, 30 October 2015
- Re: Joining the GeoJSON discussion
- Re: Joining the GeoJSON discussion
- RE: UCR issue 26
- RE: Joining the GeoJSON discussion
- FW: REMINDER next meeting of [sdwwg] at new time
- Joining the GeoJSON discussion
Wednesday, 28 October 2015
Tuesday, 27 October 2015
- Re: things and features
- Re: things and features
- Re: things and features
- Re: ACTION-91: Send an email to ogc to fix the thursday publishing deadline issue (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group)
- [Done] Re: ACTION-88: Write to us labs to get participation in the joint linksets note (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group)
- Re: JSON a link poor format
Monday, 26 October 2015
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- [public-sdw-wg] <none>
- Re: UCR issue 26
- things and features
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry?
- RE: UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry?
- Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement
- UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry?
- First Day of TPAC Meeting Notes
- WebEx for TPAC
Sunday, 25 October 2015
Friday, 23 October 2015
Thursday, 22 October 2015
- RE: Sapporo Communication
- Re: Sapporo Communication
- Sapporo Communication
- [minutes] 2015-10-21
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: The wiki now has a CRS page
- Re: The wiki now has a CRS page
- The wiki now has a CRS page
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
Wednesday, 21 October 2015
- Re: Late at teleconference today and belated regrets for last week
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- BP document now has 'drafty' Table of Contents
- Re: sdwwg: Change of meeting times for the change of season
- Re: AW: web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac?
- Late at teleconference today and belated regrets for last week
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: UCR issue 26
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: The 'valid time' requirement
Tuesday, 20 October 2015
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: UCR issue 26
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: UCR issue 26
- RE: UCR issue 26
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: UCR issue 26
- Re: UCR issue 26
- Re: UCR issue 26
- Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
- Re: The 'valid time' requirement
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
Monday, 19 October 2015
- Re: [sdwwg] CRS , SVG and Sapporo agenda
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- SDWWG: agenda for meeting on Wednesday
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'?
- RE: JSON a link poor format
Sunday, 18 October 2015
Friday, 16 October 2015
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: JSON a link poor format
- JSON a link poor format
Thursday, 15 October 2015
Wednesday, 14 October 2015
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- [Minutes] 2015-10-14
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- BP- mapping requirements to sensor data theme
- Re: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future
- Re: UCR issue 26
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Re: UCR issue 26
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
Tuesday, 13 October 2015
- Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- (lack of) availability this month
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- WebEx+Chrome+Mac = dysfunctional
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
Monday, 12 October 2015
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- SDWWG Next Meeting - UCR Issues resolution
- [sdwwg] Sapporo agenda
Sunday, 11 October 2015
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
Saturday, 10 October 2015
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
Friday, 9 October 2015
- Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
- RE: UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- RE: UCR issue 26
- Re: AW: web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac?
- Re: UCR issue 26
- UCR issue 30: missing requirement
- Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable
Thursday, 8 October 2015
- Re: UCR issue 26
- UCR issue 26
- Re: Temporal reference system
- Re: Temporal reference system
- Crossreferenced enabling discovery theme with requirements
- Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- Re: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement
- UCR ISSUE-24: clarification of lightweight APIs requirement
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- RE: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement
Wednesday, 7 October 2015
- RE: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- RE: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future
- Re: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future
- Re: UCR ACTION-17
- UCR ACTION-17
- UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement
- [Minutes] 2015 10 07
- Discovering real world objects located near sapporo
- Re: AW: web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac?
- Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: [sdwwg] meeting tomorrow
- web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac?
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- IETF geoJSON WG formally established
- apologies for call today
Tuesday, 6 October 2015
- Re: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson)
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
- Re: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson)
- RE: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future
- RE: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson)
- Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies'
Monday, 5 October 2015
- SDWWG Next Meeting - Sapporo Prep
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement
- [Minutes] 2015-09-30
- Re: The model reuse requirement
- Re: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future
- Re: FW: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson)
- FW: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson)
- Re: sdwwg: Change of meeting times for the change of season
- RE: sdwwg: Change of meeting times for the change of season
- RE: [sdwwg] meeting tomorrow
Friday, 2 October 2015
- Re: [linking-data] What do the links mean?
- Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between)
- Re: [linking-data] How can I manage links between sets of things (so that I don't have to manage individual links)?
- Re: [linking-data] How can third parties assert links and relationships (and should I trust their assertions?)
- Re: [linking-data] Where do links commonly occur (in spatial data)?
- Re: [linking-data] What else links to my subject of interest?
- Re: [linking-data] What else links to my subject of interest?
- Re: No meeting Friday 2 October