- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:13:19 +0000
- To: <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, <p.baumann@jacobs-university.de>
- Message-ID: <2A7346E8D9F62D4CA8D78387173A054A602DF906@exmbx04-cdc.nexus.csiro.au>
Ø ISO-19123-2 (the soon to be published ISO version of the OGC Coverage Implementation Schema 1.1)? ‘soon to be published’ is optimistic. It is not yet on the ISO/TC 211 program of work [1]. The duration from NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) to IS (International Standard) is never less than 3 years, even if there is a mature starting document. [1] http://www.isotc211.org/pow.htm From: Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl] Sent: Friday, 9 October 2015 11:28 PM To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>; Peter Baumann <p.baumann@jacobs-university.de> Subject: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable Issue 27<http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/27> is a special one, because it is about one of the deliverables. The Coverage in Linked Data deliverable<http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter#cov> reads "The WG will develop a formal Recommendation for expressing discrete coverage data conformant to the ISO 19123 abstract model. ..." Peter explained that this statement probably requires some adjustment, see this message<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Apr/0024.html>, otherwise the deliverable will not have the proper foundation. Do I understand correctly that is is a matter of saying that the Recommendation will not be based on ISO-19123, but on ISO-19123-2 (the soon to be published ISO version of the OGC Coverage Implementation Schema 1.1)? We can not change the charter text, but we could add a clarification (a note) in the chapter about deliverables in the UCR document (Ed, Kerry or Phil: is that correct?). If the assumption above are correct, could someone suggest a good wording for the note that should be added? Regards, Frans
Received on Saturday, 10 October 2015 06:14:07 UTC