- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:55:06 +0200
- To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, SDW WG <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Jeremy! > [snip] > > @andrea ... I think that fictional things (like Dicken's London) count as > 'real-world Things'. OK; that's counter intuitive :-) ... but I'm implying > that we _talk_ about them in the real world; they are part of the "universe > of discourse". +1 from me. But then we should make it clear that *real*-world things do include fictional ones. Or we can opt for something else, e.g., the already mentioned *spatial* thing / object. BTW, maybe I missed it, but have we taken into account the definition of geo:SpatialThing? (quoting:) "Anything with spatial extent, i.e. size, shape, or position. e.g. people, places, bowling balls, as well as abstract areas like cubes." [http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#SpatialThing] Cheers, Andrea
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 16:55:48 UTC