public-sdw-wg@w3.org from October 2015 by author

Alejandro Llaves

• Re: UCR issue 26 (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Wednesday, 14 October)

allaves@fi.upm.es

• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)

Andrea Perego

• Re: The wiki now has a CRS page (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Thursday, 8 October)

Andreas Harth

• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Late at teleconference today and belated regrets for last week (Wednesday, 21 October)

Bart van Leeuwen

• UCR ACTION-17 (Wednesday, 7 October)

Bill Roberts

• next F2F (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: things and features (Tuesday, 27 October)
• things and features (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 14 October)
• apologies for call today (Wednesday, 7 October)

Clemens Portele

• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Tuesday, 20 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: JSON a link poor format (Tuesday, 27 October)

Ed Parsons

• Re: things and features (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: things and features (Tuesday, 27 October)
• First Day of TPAC Meeting Notes (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• SDWWG Next Meeting - UCR Issues resolution (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• SDWWG Next Meeting - Sapporo Prep (Monday, 5 October)

Frans Knibbe

• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• [public-sdw-wg] <none> (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry? (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: The "Resolution global grid" requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry? (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: The wiki now has a CRS page (Thursday, 22 October)
• The wiki now has a CRS page (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Friday, 9 October)
• UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Friday, 9 October)
• Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Friday, 9 October)
• UCR issue 26 (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Temporal reference system (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Temporal reference system (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (Thursday, 8 October)
• UCR ISSUE-24: clarification of lightweight APIs requirement (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: UCR ACTION-17 (Wednesday, 7 October)
• UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: The model reuse requirement (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What do the links mean? (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [linking-data] How can I manage links between sets of things (so that I don't have to manage individual links)? (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [linking-data] How can third parties assert links and relationships (and should I trust their assertions?) (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [linking-data] Where do links commonly occur (in spatial data)? (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What else links to my subject of interest? (Friday, 2 October)

George Percivall

• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Tuesday, 13 October)

Heaven, Rachel E.

• RE: UCR issue 26 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: UCR issue 26 (Friday, 9 October)

Jeremy Tandy

• Re: Dinner (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• BP document now has 'drafty' Table of Contents (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Monday, 19 October)
• Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: UCR issue 30: missing requirement (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Tuesday, 13 October)

Jon Blower

• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: UCR issue 26 (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Thursday, 1 October)

Joshua Lieberman

• Re: Joining the GeoJSON discussion (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Sapporo Communication (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What else links to my subject of interest? (Friday, 2 October)

Kerry Taylor

• Re: Late at teleconference today and belated regrets for last week (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: sdwwg: Change of meeting times for the change of season (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: AW: web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [sdwwg] CRS , SVG and Sapporo agenda (Monday, 19 October)
• SDWWG: agenda for meeting on Wednesday (Monday, 19 October)
• BP- mapping requirements to sensor data theme (Wednesday, 14 October)
• [sdwwg] Sapporo agenda (Monday, 12 October)
• Discovering real world objects located near sapporo (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: AW: web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac? (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Wednesday, 7 October)
• web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac? (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: sdwwg: Change of meeting times for the change of season (Monday, 5 October)

Krzysztof Janowicz

• Re: things and features (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: things and features (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)

Le Phuoc, Danh

• Re: AW: web of things meets spatial data on the web at tpac? (Friday, 9 October)

Linda van den Brink

• Dinner (Sunday, 25 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Monday, 19 October)
• JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Crossreferenced enabling discovery theme with requirements (Thursday, 8 October)
• RE: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (Thursday, 8 October)
• RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Tuesday, 6 October)

Little, Chris

• RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Thursday, 8 October)
• RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• IETF geoJSON WG formally established (Wednesday, 7 October)

Peter Baumann

• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Thursday, 1 October)

Phil Archer

• Re: Joining the GeoJSON discussion (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: ACTION-91: Send an email to ogc to fix the thursday publishing deadline issue (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [Done] Re: ACTION-88: Write to us labs to get participation in the joint linksets note (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• WebEx for TPAC (Monday, 26 October)
• [sdwwg] CRS , SVG and Sapporo agenda (Friday, 23 October)
• Sapporo Communication (Thursday, 22 October)
• [minutes] 2015-10-21 (Thursday, 22 October)
• [Minutes] 2015-10-14 (Wednesday, 14 October)
• (lack of) availability this month (Tuesday, 13 October)
• WebEx+Chrome+Mac = dysfunctional (Tuesday, 13 October)
• [Minutes] 2015 10 07 (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• [Minutes] 2015-09-30 (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: FW: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson) (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: No meeting Friday 2 October (Friday, 2 October)
• No meeting Friday 2 October (Thursday, 1 October)

Philippe Thiran

• Re: [sdwwg] meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 7 October)

Scott Simmons

• Re: JSON a link poor format (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: UCR issue 26 (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: Joining the GeoJSON discussion (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: UCR ISSUE-29: add a requirement for linking CRS to geometry? (Monday, 26 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Wednesday, 21 October)
• RE: UCR issue 26 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: The 'valid time' requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: JSON a link poor format (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: JSON a link poor format (Sunday, 18 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Sunday, 11 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Sunday, 11 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Saturday, 10 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Saturday, 10 October)
• RE: The SSN requirement 'Reference external vocabularies' (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: ISSUE-15: Past, present and future (Tuesday, 6 October)
• RE: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• RE: [linking-data] What should I link to? (or link between) (Thursday, 1 October)

Svensson, Lars

• FW: REMINDER next meeting of [sdwwg] at new time (Friday, 30 October)
• Joining the GeoJSON discussion (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• RE: Sapporo Communication (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• RE: The 'valid time' requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• FW: WG Action: Formed Geographic JSON (geojson) (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: sdwwg: Change of meeting times for the change of season (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: [sdwwg] meeting tomorrow (Monday, 5 October)

Last message date: Friday, 30 October 2015 13:45:03 UTC