Re: The 'valid time' requirement

+1 to Simon's suggestion:

1) No ... 'valid time' is not in the scope of OWL Time (or it's extended
counterpart along the lines suggested by Simon)
2) Yes ... the BP should attempt to say unambiguously "this is how you
indicate a period for which {this assertion (set)} is valid"; if we can't
find something to suit already and we need to make a small
'micro-vocabulary' and publish this in the W3C namespace along with an
accompanying note then that's what we need to do

Jeremy

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 at 07:23 Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> /Lars
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Joshua Lieberman [mailto:jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2015 12:18 AM
> *To:* Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> *Cc:* frans.knibbe@geodan.nl; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: The 'valid time' requirement
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
>
>
>
> I believe that the discussion so far points towards
>
> 1)      No
>
> 2)      Yes
>
>
>
> *From:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
> <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 20 October 2015 9:49 PM
> *To:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> After having discussed this issue in the teleconference of 2015-10-14
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/10/14-sdw-minutes>, I would like to suggest a two
> step approach to solving the issue. I think two questions need to be
> answered in order:
>
>
>
> 1) Is the requirement in scope for OWL Time deliverable?
>
> 2) If the answer to question 1 is 'no', could the requirement be in scope
> for the Best Practices deliverable?
>
>
>
> Could we try to agree on an answer to question 1 first?
>
>
>
> As stated before, my feeling is that OWL Time
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/> is about representation of time, not
> about how such representations could be used. I like that definition of
> scope and we should not try to broaden it. Separation of concerns is an
> important design principle in a modular semantic web.
>
>
>
> Are there reasons for answering the first question with 'yes'?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>