- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:36:20 +0000
- To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 5:34 PM, Frans Knibbe wrote: > Another thing: I would like to note that outside of the description of the > deliverable the charter contains a definition of coverage: > “The term coverage is used to describe a feature whose properties vary with > space and / or time; for example, the variation of air temperature within a > given geographic region, or the variation of flow rate with time at a > hydrological monitoring station.” > Is that definition acceptable for everyone? I wondered about that because > the discussion also was about the definition of the term 'coverage'. Just to make sure I understand the terminology correctly: Is the "feature" you refer to in the above definition the same kind of feature we discuss in the "real-world-thing vs. feature" thread? If so, is it the properties of the feature or those of the real-world-thing that change? Best, Lars
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2015 06:36:51 UTC