- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:33:50 +0100
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
A little later than usual for this weekly mail. The minutes of last
Wednesday's call are at http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-sdw-minutes
And copied below for your convenience.
Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference
30 Sep 2015
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150930
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-sdw-irc
Attendees
Present
jtandy, Alejandro_Llaves, kerry, joshlieberman, phila,
Chunming_Hu, Maik_Reichert, Jitao_Yang, billroberts,
jonblower, Scott_Simmons, ahaller2, Payam, eparsons,
AndreaPerego
Regrets
matt perry, linda, Bart van Leeuwen, Rachel Heaven,
Simon Cox, Andreas Harth, Clemens Portele
Chair
kerry
Scribe
Alejandro_Llaves
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]approve minutes
2. [6]Progress on identifiers in Data on the Web Best
Practices WG
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataIdentifiers
3. [7]Report on CEO-LD meeting
http://www.w3.org/2015/ceo-ld/wiki/London_Kick_Off_mee
ting
4. [8]Review outstanding issues and actions (NB: please
all catch up!)
* [9]Summary of Action Items
* [10]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kerry> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group
Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 30 September 2015
<phila> Chair: Kerry
<phila> NB. Two members of the CEO-LD project are observing the
call today - Maik Riechert from the University of Reading
(colleague of Jon Blower) and Chunming Hu (W3C)
<phila> scribe: Alejandro_Llaves
<kerry> scribe+ allejandro
<kerry> scribenick: alejandro
<kerry> scribe+ alejandro
approve minutes
<jtandy> +1 (also from phila )
<kerry> [11]http://www.w3.org/2015/09/23-sdw-minutes.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/2015/09/23-sdw-minutes.html
<kerry> +1
<joshlieberman> +1
<Alejandro_Llaves> +1
<billroberts> +1
RESOLUTION: approve minutes
<kerry> [12]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
[12] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
Progress on identifiers in Data on the Web Best Practices WG
[13]http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataIdentifiers
[13] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataIdentifiers
<Alejandro_Llaves> Phil: Where are looking at the editors draft
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... last week there was a meeting in Sao
Paulo
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... It is difficult to set the scope of a BP
document
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... The group agreed on what URIs are
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... The document includes various
assumptions about how a URI is defined. Always subject to
change
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Rather than reinventing the wheel, we
used some relevant documents from the Web, with examples.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Phil thinks this can be useful for the
group.
<Alejandro_Llaves> joshlieberman: One thing I would like to see
is a clear distinction between an identifier and a locator,
because the needs are not the same in both cases.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Question to Phil about granularity
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: If I have a dataset about things, I
want URIs to identify the dataset.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... I don't think there is much distinction
between an identifier and a locator.
<Alejandro_Llaves> joshlieberman: An identifier doesn't need to
have the locator structure. Often, a locator needs a certain
navigation pattern, that an identifier does not need.
<joshlieberman> +1 Identifiers can and should be recognizable
even if locators should be treated as opaque for navigation.
<Alejandro_Llaves> eparsons: URIs can be plain identifiers, but
there is an added value in designing good well-structured URIs
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: Agree!
<kerry> +1 to jon's comment
<Alejandro_Llaves> jonblower: We need to separate the idea of
human readibility from client readibility.
<joshlieberman> Could those not speaking please mute. Thanks!
<billroberts>
[14]http://ukgovld.github.io/ukgovldwg/recommendations/uri-patt
erns.html
[14]
http://ukgovld.github.io/ukgovldwg/recommendations/uri-patterns.html
<Alejandro_Llaves> billroberts: In Data on the Web draft there
was an update about URI patterns
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... I don't know what is the status of the
document, but it worths a read.
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: I did not link to that document in
the draft because it seems it is not finished, from the github
repo.
Report on CEO-LD meeting
[15]http://www.w3.org/2015/ceo-ld/wiki/London_Kick_Off_meeting
[15] http://www.w3.org/2015/ceo-ld/wiki/London_Kick_Off_meeting
<jtandy> (I'm happy that the DWBP identifier practices apply to
SDW)
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: We met yesterday and this morning.
<phila>
[16]https://www.w3.org/2015/ceo-ld/wiki/London_Kick_Off_meeting
[16] https://www.w3.org/2015/ceo-ld/wiki/London_Kick_Off_meeting
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... The meeting went well.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... The goal of this group is to foster
collaboration between UK and China.
<Alejandro_Llaves> We talked about similar things that Jeremy
was pointing in his email (?)
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: We talked about satellite image, i.e.
coverage.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... We talked about how to describe
coverage, which does not mean this is not solved.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Another topic was Identifiers: how you
refer to the different levels of granularity related to access.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... We discussed about formats, e.g. CSV on
the Web, DataCube... How webby are they?
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... The geotemporal dimension of the
different formats we looked at seems to be 2D
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Some issues were identified, that will
be solved in the near future. Some of the people attending will
be in Sapporo.
<Alejandro_Llaves> Sorry, I don't know who is talking...
<Alejandro_Llaves> thanks
<Alejandro_Llaves> MaikRiechert: GeoDCAT could be a good
testbed for our project MELODIES
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: There are some issues important to
coverage data that need to be discussed first in the SDW group
first
<Alejandro_Llaves> eparsons: Is the output of the CEO-LD group
publish-able as part of the SDW BP document?
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: The CEO-LD can offer advise, but the
SDW group should decide what to publish.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Citizen science and gamification could
be the way of advance in the CEO-LD group
Review outstanding issues and actions (NB: please all catch up!)
<kerry> [17]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/
[17] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/
<phila> action-79?
<trackbot> action-79 -- Jeremy Tandy to Create thread for each
linking theme -- due 2015-09-30 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> [18]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/79
[18] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/79
<phila> action-78?
<trackbot> action-78 -- Jon Blower to Provide text around value
add of following the bps -- due 2015-09-23 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/78
[19] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/78
<Alejandro_Llaves> jonblower: I need to catch on my action
<phila> action-75?
<trackbot> action-75 -- Joshua Lieberman to Ask tesbed email
list to proide pointers to content we should knpow -- due
2015-09-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [20]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/75
[20] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/75
<Alejandro_Llaves> joshlieberman: I need to catch on my action
<phila> action-72?
<trackbot> action-72 -- Ed Parsons to Create appropriate wiki
page -- due 2015-09-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [21]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/72
[21] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/72
<phila> close action-72
<trackbot> Closed action-72.
<phila> close action-71
<trackbot> Closed action-71.
<phila> close action-63
<trackbot> Closed action-63.
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: I could not meet her yet, but
hopefully this happens soon. - Related to Phil's action. (which
one?)
<phila> action-60?
<trackbot> action-60 -- Kerry Taylor to Follow up with svg --
due 2015-08-12 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [22]http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/60
[22] http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/60
<kerry> Reminder Sapporo meeting starts 26 October:
[23]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#Sapporo
[23] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#Sapporo
<Alejandro_Llaves> kerry: The accommodation arrangements should
be done ASAP. We will discuss the agenda on the next meeting.
<kerry> The 7 discussion threads of best practice linking:
[24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Sep/0
044.html
[24]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Sep/0044.html
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: Thanks to the contributors!
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: As editors, we need the group
feedback and comments.
<phila> crickets...
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Are there any questions or
clarifications that we can discuss now?
<Alejandro_Llaves> <tumbleweed>
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: Don't be shy about replying to the
different email threads I sent around, because this will be the
basic input for the document.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Only 3 weeks away to TPAC, so please put
your content in.
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... Topics being discussed:
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... - One identifier to several spatial
objects
<Alejandro_Llaves> ... - There has been also some discussion on
the linking aspect of spatial data.
<Alejandro_Llaves> kerry: When do you want the comments by?
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: Max. by mid October
<Alejandro_Llaves> kerry: In Sapporo we could look at the
relation between the present content and the Requirements
document.
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: Agree!
<Alejandro_Llaves> Yes, I will!
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: Task - Map reqs to the BP themes.
<Alejandro_Llaves> kerry: Also, take into account open issues
on the track.
<kerry> actions: alejandro to map use cases to bp themes
<Alejandro_Llaves> Ok, no prob!
<kerry> ACTION: kerry to map use cases to bp themes [recorded
in [25]http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-sdw-minutes.html#action01]
[25] http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-sdw-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-81 - Map use cases to bp themes [on
Kerry Taylor - due 2015-10-07].
<Zakim> phila, you wanted to talk about themes
<Alejandro_Llaves> phila: This idea of "themes" arose during a
meeting last week, e.g. discoverability, etc. Each best
practice in our document will have one or more icons describing
what the theme is about.
<kerry> +1
<Alejandro_Llaves> jtandy: Good idea
<Alejandro_Llaves> kerry: Closing the meeting...
<eparsons> Bye !
<Alejandro_Llaves> thanks, bye!
<chunming> thank you all. bye
<Payam> thanks, bye
<kerry> bye!
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: kerry to map use cases to bp themes [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-sdw-minutes.html#action01]
[26] http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-sdw-minutes.html#action01
Summary of Resolutions
1. [27]approve minutes
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 12:33:56 UTC