Re: [linking-data] How can third parties assert links and relationships (and should I trust their assertions?)

Hello,

What kind of links and relationships are meant in the case of this
question? Surely it is only about spatial or temporal links and
relationships?

Greetings,
Frans


2015-09-29 16:04 GMT+02:00 Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>:

> In a way, an oa:Annotation (as in W3C Open Annotation) is a reified link,
> to which we can attach further metadata (who made the annotation, why,
> when, etc).
>
> You can annotate annotations, and so on.
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
>
>
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 15:36, Heaven, Rachel E. <reh@bgs.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Related questions –
>
> How can metadata be associated with a link statement ? (who made the
> statement, when the statement was made, how certain it is, temporal extent
> of validity).
>
> How can I assert something about a third party’s link statement e.g. if I
> want to rate it as validated/wrong/dubious ?
>
>
>
> Not just a spatial data issue...Jeni Tennison wrote a blog post several
> years ago on this [1] – someone more informed than me can tell me if this
> is now resolved..
>
>
>
> Rachel
>
>
>
> [1]
> http://www.jenitennison.com/2008/04/11/metadata-about-rdf-triples-reification-and-linked-data.html
>
>
>
> *From:* Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com
> <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* 24 September 2015 09:38
> *To:* SDW WG Public List
> *Subject:* [linking-data] How can third parties assert links and
> relationships (and should I trust their assertions?)
>
>
>
> Email thread for collecting discussion on the question: "How can third
> parties assert links and relationships (and should I trust their
> assertions)?"
>
>
>
> The related wiki entry for this questions is here [1]
>
>
>
> For instructions about how to engage with this discussion, please see my
> previous email [2].
>
>
>
> Many thanks. Jeremy
>
>
>
> [1]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data#How_can_third_parties_assert_links_and_relationships_.28and_should_I_trust_their_assertions.3F.29
>
>
> [2]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Sep/0044.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt
> from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in
> an electronic records management system.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>