- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:10:37 +0100
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Following tradition, the minutes of yesterday's meeting are at http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes A text version is pasted below. Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 21 Oct 2015 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-irc Attendees Present kerry, jtandy, frans, BartvanLeeuwen, Alejandro_Llaves, Payam, LarsG, ahaller2, Linda, MattPerry, joshli, AZ Regrets Phila, Ed, Andreas Harth, Andrea Perego, Rachel Heaven Chair kerry Scribe bart Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]last approve meetings minutes 2. [5]approve last weeks minutes https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2 0151021 3. [6]Patent call 4. [7]Best Practice editors: task responsibilities 5. [8]Summary of discussion on linking data 6. [9]<BartvanLeeuwen> Topic: Sapporo Communication: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2F_Sapporo 7. [10]Summary of discussion on linking data * [11]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 21 October 2015 <kerry> scribe: bart <kerry> scribenick: bart <kerry> scribenick bartvanleeuwen last approve meetings minutes <BartvanLeeuwen> [12]http://www.w3.org/2015/10/14-sdw-minutes.html [12] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/14-sdw-minutes.html approve last weeks minutes [13]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151021 [13] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151021 <Linda> +1 <jtandy> +1 <LarsG> +1 <Alejandro_Llaves> +1 <frans> +1 <Payam> +1 <BartvanLeeuwen> RESOLVED: approve last weeks minutes [14]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon201510 21 [14] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151021 Patent call <kerry> [15]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call [15] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call Best Practice editors: task responsibilities <Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to remind Kerry to remind everyone else about the time change after TPAC <frans> couldn´t the reminder of sending reminders be an action for Kerry? <BartvanLeeuwen> New time for meetings after TPAC! <jtandy> think it was 8pm UTC <Linda> go ahead <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: we have decided to organize ourselves for 3 different task <kerry> ACTION: kerry to remind on new meeting times for northern hemisphere summer [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action01] [16] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-83 - Remind on new meeting times for northern hemisphere summer [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-10-28]. <BartvanLeeuwen> 1) issue management, managing topic chats and keep people on topic, Payam will take that task <Payam> sure <BartvanLeeuwen> Another thing Payam will chase people down for evidence of BPs <BartvanLeeuwen> 2) analysis byt jtandy of what needs to be done <BartvanLeeuwen> 3) Main writer of the document will be Linda <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: instead of having discussions on email / wiki we try to write our documents as we go, so that you can see your changes happening <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: approach based on Payam experience with a previous group <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: we almost got a BP document into the repository <Payam> Spatial Data on the Web Best Practice <Payam> DRAFT Table of Contents <Payam> 1. Introduction <Payam> i. General intro <Payam> ii. Difference between spatial data on the web and current SDI practice <Payam> iii. Principles [17]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Principles [17] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Principles <Payam> 2. Conformance <Payam> 3. Audience <Payam> i. Geospatial experts without web knowledge? (LvdB: Are we targetting them? Are they our Small Set of Known Developers?) <Payam> ii. Web developers without geospatial knowledge aka the Large Set of Unknown Developers <Payam> iii. Content publishers <Payam> 4. Scope <Payam> 5. Best Practices Template <Payam> i. Best Practice Requirements <Payam> 6. Best Practices Summary <Payam> 7. The Best Practices <Payam> i. Linking Data <Payam> ii. Publishing data with clear semantics <Payam> iii. Exposing datasets through APIs <Payam> iv. Enabling discovery <Payam> v. Assigning identifiers to real world things and information resources <Payam> vi. Expressing spatial data – vocabularies & encodings <Payam> A. (geo)spatial information <Payam> B. temporal information <Payam> C. sensor data <Payam> vii. Dealing with large datasets <Payam> viii. Displaying spatial data on maps (IMO out of scope - LvdB) <Payam> 8. Conclusions <Payam> 9. Glossary <BartvanLeeuwen> Linda: document only availble as word <Payam> 10. Cross-reference of use-cases against best practices <Payam> A. Acknowledgements <Payam> B. References <Payam> i. Normative references <Payam> it's a bit messy- sorry about that <Payam> I copied/pasted from a word file <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: this is not a final document structure, but we think these are the sections we need to fill out <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: some might go out during the process <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: we wanted to have the sections in place before the Sapporo F2F <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: we will start writing on the BP during the F2F, that is the main focus of the meeting. <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: we are keen on getting feedback on the content, there will be an editor's draft by the end of the afternoon <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: the structure is the same structure as the DWBP document <Linda> Addition: request to anyone to review the TOC so that we can work with an agreed structure next week in Sapporo. <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: request to anyone to review the TOC so that we can work with an agreed structure next week in Sapporo. <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: explains the structure of the document, general w3c parts <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: audience is important topic, who do we write this for <kerry> +1 to addressing Geospatial experts without web knowledge? <kerry> +1 to Displaying spatial data on maps is out of scope <Payam> +q <BartvanLeeuwen> frans: this is supposed to be a BP document, and not a 'best theories' document. we need evidence, how will the evidence be included <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: one of the points we need to include in the description of the best practices is examples <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: and we need to have be able to point to those examples. <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: there will be adaption required to make it work <BartvanLeeuwen> Payam: if we have content in the document, we will be asking for examples and links to descriptions <BartvanLeeuwen> Payam: if you point to examples and best practices from the public mail archive I'll pick them up there. <BartvanLeeuwen> joshli: I hope we don't get hung up on links, they might not be persistent <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: we do have the oportunity to construct the evidence ourselves <Payam> +1 joshli - good examples will be also very helpful <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: Linda and geonovum have a tender for testbed for these best practices <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: there will be a gap, things that should be done, but are not being done. we need to be carefull to include them, we have to be careful to not put in theories. <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: maybe we need a note for 'emerging practices' <ahaller2> +1 emerging practises <BartvanLeeuwen> frans: in the UCR somebody put his sources in the Github repository to prevent ' link rot' Summary of discussion on linking data <jtandy> [18]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data [18] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: we are trying to continue the discussion from last weeks call <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: the offline notes are on the wiki: [19]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data [19] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data <BartvanLeeuwen> Topic: Sapporo Communication: [20]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2F_Sapporo [20] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2F_Sapporo <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: we will have TOC of our BP in github <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: the people in sapporo will be working on that document <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: we will be keeping github up to date <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: we will have a meeting record on IRC, but not minute to minute like today <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: IRC will be the channel to contact us <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: hopefully we probably will have Webex, IRC is the best way to get to us <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: at 5PM local time we will do a catch up session <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: we are expecting a few people to come along to talk to us from other groups <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: Sato taraki ? will talk about SVG , Hadley Beaman , and IOT interest group, and even timbl signed up <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: Dinner sunday night, for anyone who want to show up <Linda> bad timing Jeremy <BartvanLeeuwen> kerry: there is a adhoc on the wednesday <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: there will be geojson people as well. <jtandy> [21]https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data#Summary_o f_discussion [21] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data#Summary_of_discussion Summary of discussion on linking data <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: our focus will be on gathering content, not polished documents. bullet points are good, as long as it is public <BartvanLeeuwen> jtandy: kerry called it 'drafty' <jtandy> [22]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Oct/ 0105.html [22] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Oct/0105.html <jtandy> JSON a link poor format <BartvanLeeuwen> joshli: the linking in JSON-LD needs more best practices <BartvanLeeuwen> joshli: what types of interactions we have on a resource <frans> +1 to looking at raw HTTP as an API <kerry> bart says the new linked data platform working grop will be attacking this <BartvanLeeuwen> hydra: [23]http://www.hydra-cg.com/ [23] http://www.hydra-cg.com/ <kerry> ... and bart says we should point to that instead of inventing here <kerry> ... bart says the linked data platform mailing list discusses this - and the hydra one too -- cannot point to anything directly <kerry> ACTION: bart to assemble linkks to actionable data on the web for sapporo meeting [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action02] [24] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-84 - Assemble linkks to actionable data on the web for sapporo meeting [on Bart van Leeuwen - due 2015-10-28]. <kerry> bart wants us not to stretch too far in that direction but to leave to others <jtandy> [25]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Oct/ 0125.html [25] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Oct/0125.html <jtandy> Does 'Feature' = 'Real World Thing'? <joshli> departing the IRC but staying on phone. Ta <kerry> agreed -- i was surprised to see the variation in interpretation of "feature" <frans> I agree with Kerry <Payam> I have to leave. thank you all. <BartvanLeeuwen> yup <kerry> rrsagent make logs public <frans> Have a good day or night! <Linda> ok thanks bye <Alejandro_Llaves> Thanks, bye! <kerry> rrsagent draft minutes <MattPerry> bye <kerry> rrsagentdraft minutes Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: bart to assemble linkks to actionable data on the web for sapporo meeting [recorded in [26]http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: kerry to remind on new meeting times for northern hemisphere summer [recorded in [27]http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ [26] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action02 [27] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes.html#action01
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2015 20:10:51 UTC