- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:10:05 +0000
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: SDW WG <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_2jzuY1YeuT93TcnSQH_yMjyp5=pfuAVJqhBTFCV_QMKA@mail.gmail.com>
@lars ... many thanks. It's good to be able to point to evidence of this practice! On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 at 09:43 Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote: > Jeremy, Andrea, > > Most interesting discussion, particularly for non-geographers like me who > still try to grasp what a "feature" is... > > On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 6:55 PM, Andrea Perego wrote: > > > > @andrea ... I think that fictional things (like Dicken's London) count > as > > > 'real-world Things'. OK; that's counter intuitive :-) ... but I'm > implying > > > that we _talk_ about them in the real world; they are part of the > "universe > > > of discourse". > > > > +1 from me. But then we should make it clear that *real*-world things > > do include fictional ones. Or we can opt for something else, e.g., the > > already mentioned *spatial* thing / object. > > Yes, I agree that fictional things are a subclass of real-world things (or > at least that we should treat them as if they were). This is also the way > we model it in the DNB's authority data and the GND ontology. Hermione > Granger [1] is a "Literary or Legendary Character" [2] which is a subclass > of "Differentiated Person" [3] and thus a "Person". Atlantis [4] is a > "Fictive Place" [5] which is a subclass of "Place or Geographic Name" (to > get back to the geographic domain...). > > [1] http://d-nb.info/gnd/1029449120 > [2] http://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#LiteraryOrLegendaryCharacter > [3] http://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#DifferentiatedPerson > [4] http://d-nb.info/gnd/4003385-5 > [5] http://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#FictivePlace > [6] http://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#PlaceOrGeographicName > > Best, > > Lars >
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2015 12:10:44 UTC