Re: Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked Data deliverable

yes, indeed ISO will take its time. Once there, ISO CIS will stay for many years
as ISO's understanding of coverages.
It will be a core decision for the SDW WG whether to bypass ISO and INSPIRE and
establish a silo solution, or be compatible with the mainstream.

-Peter


On 2015-10-10 08:13, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
>
> Ø  ISO-19123-2 (the soon to be published ISO version of the OGC Coverage
> Implementation Schema 1.1)?
>
>  
>
> ‘soon to be published’ is optimistic.
>
> It is not yet on the ISO/TC 211 program of work [1].
>
> The duration from NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) to IS (International Standard)
> is never less than 3 years, even if there is a mature starting document.
>
>  
>
> [1] http://www.isotc211.org/pow.htm
>
>  
>
> *From:*Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Sent:* Friday, 9 October 2015 11:28 PM
> *To:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>; Peter Baumann
> <p.baumann@jacobs-university.de>
> *Subject:* Issue 27: correction of the description of the Coverage in Linked
> Data deliverable
>
>  
>
> Issue 27 <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/27> is a special one,
> because it is about one of the deliverables. The Coverage in Linked Data
> deliverable <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter#cov> reads "The WG will
> develop a formal Recommendation for expressing discrete coverage data
> conformant to the ISO 19123 abstract model. ..."
>
>  
>
> Peter explained that this statement probably requires some adjustment, see
> this message
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Apr/0024.html>,
> otherwise the deliverable will not have the proper foundation.
>
>  
>
> Do I understand correctly that is is a matter of saying that the
> Recommendation will not be based on ISO-19123, but on ISO-19123-2 (the soon to
> be published ISO version of the OGC Coverage Implementation Schema 1.1)?
>
>  
>
> We can not change the charter text, but we could add a clarification (a note)
> in the chapter about deliverables in the UCR document (Ed, Kerry or Phil: is
> that correct?).
>
>  
>
> If the assumption above are correct, could someone suggest a good wording for
> the note that should be added?
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>

-- 
Dr. Peter Baumann
 - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
   www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
   mail: p.baumann@jacobs-university.de
   tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
   www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann@rasdaman.com
   tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)