Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions
- Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions
- Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions
[admin] Boris Zbarsky is a new Editor of Web IDL spec
[Bug 23369] New: Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
- [Bug 23369] Provide hooks for Typed Arrays
[Bug 23367] New: Move exceptions into IDL
[Bug 23358] New: A hook for objects that can enter a "dead" mode
- [Bug 23358] A hook for objects that can enter a "dead" mode
- [Bug 23358] A hook for objects that can enter a "dead" mode
- [Bug 23358] A hook for objects that can enter a "dead" mode
- [Bug 23358] A hook for objects that can enter a "dead" mode
Using arrays in platform APIs
How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
- Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable
[WebIDL] Which realm should be used for coercing null/undefined this values to "the" global object?
- Re: [WebIDL] Which realm should be used for coercing null/undefined this values to "the" global object?
[WebIDL] Eliminating [ImplicitThis] in favor of [Global]
[Bug 23296] New: Serializer grammar productions missing closing ";"
[Bug 23295] New: "attribute" serializer types missing from grammar
[Bug 23277] New: Broken references to EcmaScript spec
[Bug 23276] New: "If creating is false and O does not implement a..."
- [Bug 23276] "If creating is false and O does not implement a..."
- [Bug 23276] "If creating is false and O does not implement a..."
[Bug 23266] New: ExtendedAttributeTypePair grammar appears wrong
Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests
- Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests
- Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests
- RE: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests
Maplike
[Bug 20020] Support subclassing Array
[Bug 20020] Support subclassing Array
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 20020] Support subclassing Array
[Bug 20020] Support subclassing Array
[Bug 23225] New: Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
- [Bug 23225] Let's start using class, not interface
[Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
[Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
[Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
Re: Reconciling handling of optional arguments and handling of default values across ES and webidl
- Re: Reconciling handling of optional arguments and handling of default values across ES and webidl
- Re: Reconciling handling of optional arguments and handling of default values across ES and webidl
- Re: Reconciling handling of optional arguments and handling of default values across ES and webidl
- Re: Reconciling handling of optional arguments and handling of default values across ES and webidl
[Bug 23202] New: Add @@unscopeables sugar
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
URLQuery / FormData
- Re: URLQuery / FormData
- Re: URLQuery / FormData
- RE: URLQuery / FormData
- Re: URLQuery / FormData
Re: [whatwg] [[GetOwnProperty]] for named properties of the Window object
Re: Structured clones
Promises: final steps
- Re: Promises: final steps
- Re: Promises: final steps
[Bug 23133] New: Hook up interface object proto chains as if they were ES6 classes
Another case of wanting to a test like isArray, this time on exceptions
document.body.appendChild(promiseForNode)
Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
- Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?
Parameter to promise constructor
[Bug 23087] New: Undefined variable use in the overload resolution algorithm
Feature-detectable API extensions?
- Re: Feature-detectable API extensions?
- Re: Feature-detectable API extensions?
[Bug 23077] New: "a value (matching DefaultValue)"
[Bug 23076] New: Change "float" in examples to "double"
[Bug 23074] New: " If a “forEach” operation is defined, then Call..."
[Bug 23056] New: Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
- [Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
URL.domainToASCII / URL.domainToUnicode
Iterator protocol for DOM objects with indexed getter
Non-agression pact for the JS runtime namespace territory
- RE: Non-agression pact for the JS runtime namespace territory
- Re: Non-agression pact for the JS runtime namespace territory
- Re: Non-agression pact for the JS runtime namespace territory
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22947] New: Operation functions should not have a prototype property
- [Bug 22947] Operation functions should not have a prototype property
- [Bug 22947] Operation functions should not have a prototype property
- [Bug 22947] Operation functions should not have a prototype property
- [Bug 22947] Operation functions should not have a prototype property
Re: test suite for Web IDL v1
Storage Relationships (was Block Level API)
Block Level API
[Bug 22912] New: fix [[Delete]] due to how it's changed in ES6
Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- Re: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- RE: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- RE: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- Re: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- Re: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- Re: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
- Re: Request for feedback: Filesystem API
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 22507] Need to define behaviour for setting properties on named properties objects
[Bug 21929] named properties object should disallow definition of non-configurable properties
[Bug 20481] Grammar Fixes needed: Dominique's feedback + Microsoft's feedback
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
Outline of exactly how @@create works?
Elements (extends Array)
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
IDL enumeration & String.prototype.normalize
[Bug 20453] 3.1: two questions re underscore removal
[Bug 22888] New: 4.2.{14,15}: "has the same numeric value"
[Bug 20453] 3.1: two questions re underscore removal
[Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous
[Bug 22156] Allow trailing commas in Web IDL lists
[Bug 22887] New: 4.7.4: "listed in description"
[Bug 22886] New: 3.2.6: italicized "i-1"
[Bug 22156] Allow trailing commas in Web IDL lists
[Bug 20653] need a way for Web Components to cause new interface objects to exist dynamically
[Bug 22883] New: 4.5.1.1: "the argument at index i"
[Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
[Bug 22882] New: 4.5.1.1: "an arguments"
[Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
[Bug 22156] Allow trailing commas in Web IDL lists
[Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
[Bug 19778] Wrong regex for integer
[Bug 20444] 4.*: "descriptor { ... }"
[Bug 20452] 4.2.16: extraneous "the"
[Bug 20453] 3.1: two questions re underscore removal
[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22392] maybe define .name for Function objects corresponding to operations/attributes
[Bug 22509] Some way to express array as readonly and fixed length
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 21295] overload resolution: are DOMString and sequence<T> distinguishable now?
[Bug 22874] New: #es-stringifier algorithm shouldn't use ToString(V)
[Bug 22507] Need to define behaviour for setting properties on named properties objects
[Bug 22506] Named properties object should probably not be a function object
[Bug 22312] Typo?
[Bug 22156] Allow trailing commas in Web IDL lists
[Bug 21929] named properties object should disallow definition of non-configurable properties
[Bug 21670] Clarify that typeof InterfaceObject should be "function"
[Bug 21669] Callable interface objects should be instance of Function
[Bug 21640] Dictionaries and callbacks should be distinguishable
[Bug 20777] Getting a property from the global scope polluter ends up in an infinite loop
[Bug 20653] need a way for Web Components to cause new interface objects to exist dynamically
[Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties
[Bug 20561] Objects supporting indexed properties
[Bug 20528] Definition of [[Prototype]] for the interface prototype object is confusing
[Bug 20527] Comment about NamedPropertiesObject is incorrect
[Bug 20481] Grammar Fixes needed: Dominique's feedback + Microsoft's feedback
[Bug 20478] Grammar allows "static;" as a valid operation
[Bug 20475] Grammar allows "- Infinity", but not "- 1"
[Bug 20453] 3.1: two questions re underscore removal
[Bug 20452] 4.2.16: extraneous "the"
[Bug 20444] 4.*: "descriptor { ... }"
[Bug 22872] New: 4.8: bad link for "single operation callback interface"
- [Bug 22872] 4.8: bad link for "single operation callback interface"
- [Bug 22872] 4.8: bad link for "single operation callback interface"
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 22871] New: 4.6.4: "does not to implement"
[Bug 22870] New: 4.2.*: "the value of dictionary member"
- [Bug 22870] 4.2.*: "the value of dictionary member"
- [Bug 22870] 4.2.*: "the value of dictionary member"
- [Bug 22870] 4.2.*: "the value of dictionary member"
[Bug 20443] 4.4.6: "is not of the enumeration’s values"
[Bug 20440] 4.4.1.1: "of it type list"
[Bug 20419] 4.2.24.2: missing "then"?
[Bug 20422] 4.2.21: "then then"
[Bug 20441] algorithms not marked as such
[Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
[Bug 21589] SelectionMode enum should not have a trailing comma
[Bug 20443] 4.4.6: "is not of the enumeration’s values"
[Bug 20442] 4.2.24: <ul> should be <ol>
[Bug 20440] 4.4.1.1: "of it type list"
[Bug 20439] 4.4.6: <span class="desc">
[Bug 20422] 4.2.21: "then then"
[Bug 20419] 4.2.24.2: missing "then"?
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18352] Note about Object.prototype.toString is unclear
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
[Bug 19778] Wrong regex for integer
[Bug 22866] New: remove Object.prototype.toString override and use ES6 @@toStringTag instead
[Bug 22014] newly created exception objects should have the exception prototype interface object as their [[Prototype]]
[Bug 22013] property enumeration section should mention named property visibility
[Bug 22006] need to define that the .length of a stringifier's Function object is 0
[Bug 22859] New: use built-in ToUint8 etc. abstract operations
[Bug 21270] Introduce syntax for getters that keep returning the same object
Re: [WebIDL] editorial: unrestricted double and precision
Re: Why do we allow overloads on legacycallers?
[Bug 22858] New: use @hasInstance instance of [[HasInstance]]
Re: [WebIDL] Should stringifiers use [[Get]] and [[Call]] or call the canonical getter/function?
Re: [WebIDL] Definition of "single operation interface" questions
Re: Interaction of non-configurable attributes and named getters
Re: [webidl] Spec for callback interface interface objects is self-contradictory in places
Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
Forbid constants on [noInterfaceObject] interfaces
- Re: Forbid constants on [noInterfaceObject] interfaces
- Re: Forbid constants on [noInterfaceObject] interfaces
[Bug 22845] New: Consider moving the overload resolution algorithm into its own section
IO streams
[Bug 22824] New: Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
- [Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL
Should ByteString be a serializable type?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 22808] New: Throw if you object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
- [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new
[Bug 22806] New: Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
- [Bug 22806] Why special case Date and RegExp in #es-sequence
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
Promises - review of use in Network Service Discovery draft?
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check
[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]
[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...]
Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
Re: [WebIDL] Callback functions and callback interfaces should allow optional arguments sanely
Re: Extended attribute grammar too complex?
Re: Small grammar problem
Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
- Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
- Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
Re: Interaction of dictionaries and platform objects is a bit weird
- Re: Interaction of dictionaries and platform objects is a bit weird
- Re: Interaction of dictionaries and platform objects is a bit weird
Re: WebIDL grammar allows "static;", which seems broken
Re: [WebIDL] Type conversions triggered by "any" can be lossy
Promises "if not omitted" language
- RE: Promises "if not omitted" language
Re: "var" declarations shadowing properties from Window.prototype
Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- RE: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- RE: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- Re: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
- RE: Maybe we should think about Interface.isInterface functions again
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?
Object sharing across globals
[Bug 22691] New: Remove ByteString from WebIDL
[Bug 22665] New: Wrong example for [TreatNonCallableAsNull]
[Bug 22358] Add a "this is the global" annotation
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 22391] Sequence or Array
[Bug 21295] overload resolution: are DOMString and sequence<T> distinguishable now?
ByteString in Web IDL
- Re: ByteString in Web IDL
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 21591] String constant on NavigatorID is invalid per WebIDL
[Bug 21591] String constant on NavigatorID is invalid per WebIDL
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22625] New: "If x < 253 or x > 253, then throw a TypeError."
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22320] Form's supported property names should perhaps not be enumerable
[Bug 22600] New: Need a way to make navigator.plugins supported named properties not enumerable
- [Bug 22600] Need a way to make navigator.plugins supported named properties not enumerable
- [Bug 22600] Need a way to make navigator.plugins supported named properties not enumerable
- [Bug 22600] Need a way to make navigator.plugins supported named properties not enumerable
- [Bug 22600] Need a way to make navigator.plugins supported named properties not enumerable