Re: ByteString in Web IDL

* Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
>Anyway, we don't need to design a new API here. Boris and Jonas have 
>pointed out that the XMLHttpRequest API has to behave the way it does 
>because it's a legacy API, and I accept that. What I'm asking for is 
>that this legacy doesn't prejudice new APIs, that ByteString is removed 
>from Web IDL, and that the legacy behavior is described entirely within 
>the XMLHttpRequest spec.

"Method does not accept strings with code units greater than 255" is not
"legacy behavior" in any common sense of that expression.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 13:24:57 UTC