W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: WebIDL grammar allows "static;", which seems broken

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:43:13 +1000
Message-ID: <51EE17F1.5000606@mcc.id.au>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>

Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Looks pretty good.
>
> There are two stray references to "Qualifier" in 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 that
> are now dead links and should probably talk about "static" and
> "stringifier" instead).

Thanks, fixed.

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 05:43:45 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Boris Zbarsky: "Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?"
Previous message: Cameron McCormack: "Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?"
In reply to: Boris Zbarsky: "Re: WebIDL grammar allows "static;", which seems broken"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:17 UTC