Re: WebIDL grammar allows "static;", which seems broken

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:43:13 +1000
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51EE17F1.5000606@mcc.id.au>

Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Looks pretty good.
>
> There are two stray references to "Qualifier" in 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 that
> are now dead links and should probably talk about "static" and
> "stringifier" instead).

Thanks, fixed.

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 05:43:45 UTC