- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 17:41:54 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22824
Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mounir@lamouri.fr
--- Comment #3 from Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Ah, indeed. Based on the es-discuss conversation, I wonder if we should try
> to remove that function and instead introduce valueAsTimestamp().
I think that .valueAsNumber() does what you would like .valueAsTimestamp() to
do.
This said, I am not convinced that not using Date in Web APIs is a good thing.
It is not very developer friendly to use raw types such as timestamps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 17:41:55 UTC